{"id":65533,"date":"2026-09-17T06:18:18","date_gmt":"2026-09-17T10:18:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.wukongsch.com\/blog\/?p=65533"},"modified":"2026-09-17T06:23:28","modified_gmt":"2026-09-17T10:23:28","slug":"news-2026-09-17-why-positive-discipline-is-changing-k-12-education","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.wukongsch.com\/blog\/news-2026-09-17-why-positive-discipline-is-changing-k-12-education-post-65533\/","title":{"rendered":"From Punishment to Support: How Positive Discipline Is Influencing K-12 Education"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

When a young child disrupts a classroom, refuses to follow instructions, or struggles to manage frustration, teachers face an immediate challenge: how should they respond without losing control of the classroom or pushing the child further away from learning?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For decades, school discipline has often relied on consequences designed to stop unwanted behavior. But a growing body of research is prompting educators and policymakers to look more closely at what happens after a child is punished \u2014 and whether disciplinary measures actually help students develop the skills needed to respond differently next time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A September 2026 report from the Children\u2019s Equity Project at Arizona State University<\/a> examined harsh punishment and exclusionary discipline in early childhood education, including suspension and expulsion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The report reviewed research, federal requirements, and state policies, and concluded that harsh and exclusionary discipline is not associated with positive developmental outcomes. It also highlighted disparities in which children are most likely to be removed from learning environments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Although the report focuses primarily on early childhood, its findings add to a broader discussion across education about whether discipline should simply stop disruptive behavior or also help students develop the skills needed to manage challenges more successfully.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

<\/span>Why Harsh Discipline Is Facing Greater Scrutiny<\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

One of the strongest concerns raised in the Children\u2019s Equity Project report is that exclusionary discipline does not affect all children equally.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to federal preschool data reviewed in the report, Black children represented about 18% of preschool enrollment but 38% of children who received one or more suspensions<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Children receiving services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act represented approximately 23% of enrollment but 74% of preschool expulsions<\/strong>, while boys accounted for about 54% of enrollment and 84% of expulsions<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

These differences have intensified questions about when suspension, expulsion and other exclusionary practices are used \u2014 particularly with very young children whose emotional regulation and communication skills are still developing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The issue is not simply whether schools should have rules. Researchers and educators are increasingly examining whether removing a child from the learning environment addresses the reason the behavior occurred in the first place.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Young children are still developing skills such as:<\/p>\n\n\n\n